September 8, 2010
 
 
ABOUT US   |  EMPLOYMENT  |   TESTIMONIALS  

Wall Street Journal
Released Annually in September

The following information is based solely on opinions and behaviors of 3,267 MBA recruiters who hire full time business school graduates based on interviews conducted between December 6, 2004 and March 9, 2005. Schools without traditional full time programs and those not graduating 50 students in full-time programs in 2004 were removed from consideration. For this most recent survey, 186 U.S. schools and 79 international schools were eligible for ranking. Rankings were then categorized into three main groups: National Ranking (19 N. American schools), Regional Ranking (47 N. American schools), and International Ranking (20 schools). Schools are grouped according to the recruiters they share, which is based on where recruiters say they are inclined to recruit. Additionally, recruiters are asked to rank schools based on 21 key attributes:

  1. Ability to work well within at team
  2. Analytical and problem-solving skills
  3. Career services office at that school
  4. Commitment to corporate social responsibility, such as community service and environmental protection
  5. Communication and interpersonal skills
  6. Content of the curriculum
  7. Faculty expertise
  8. Fit with the corporate culture
  9. Incorporates experiential learning into the curriculum
  10. Leadership potential
  11. Likelihood of recruiting "stars" - that is, graduates who are very likely to be promoted within the company
  12. Overall value for the money invested in the recruiting effort
  13. Personal ethics and integrity
  14. Strategic thinking
  15. Student chemistry - that is, the general like or dislike a recruiter has of the students overall
  16. Student's average number of years of work experience
  17. Success with past hires
  18. Well-roundedness
  19. Willingness of the schools' students to relocate to the job location you require
  20. Likelihood of extending an offer to a student in the next 2 years
  21. Likelihood of making an effort to recruit at the school in the next 2 years
WSJ does not use specified or concrete criteria in defining which school is eligible for which ranking. Rather, this is the information considered in the breakdown of each of the rankings.

National Ranking: Refers to North American schools that tend to share the same recruiters. Many of the schools included in this ranking are private and located in the east. Also, recruiters that tend to recruit at these schools typically come from larger companies.

Regional Ranking: Includes schools from all of North America that are both public and private. Typically schools are smaller and recruiters tend to recruit locally around particular schools and pay less than recruiters included in the National Ranking.

Internation Ranking: Only schools that attract global recruiters are included.

Source: Career Journal

2007 Full Time Student Rankings
Rank
School
Location
National North American Schools
1
Dartmouth (Tuck)
NH
2
UC Berkeley (Haas)
CA
3
Columbia
NY
4
MIT (Sloan)
MA
5
Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)
PA
International Schools
1
ESADE
Spain
2
IMB
Tirana, Albania
3
London Business School
London, England
4
IPADE
Mexico City, Mexico
5
MIT (Sloan)
MA
Regional North American Schools
1
Brigham Young (Marriott)
UT
2
Wake Forest (Babcock)
NC
3
Ohio State (Fisher)
OH
4
University of Rochester (Simon)
NY
5
Indiana (Kelley)
IN

 

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • The WSJ is ranked solely by recruiters. Arguably these are the people MBA graduates are most concerned with impressing those how are the most influential in an individual's post MBA career.

Cons:

  • There is no data indicatin who the recruiters are or what thier experience recruiting MBA candidates entails.
  • The opinions of recruiters are based on past recruiting experiences with schools and may not accurately reflect the caliber of students graduating from a particular B-School.
  • The method behind the breakdown of the three separate rankings is not clear and there is no specific method offered.
  • As the job market changes and fields become more and less popular, recruiters will inevitably change where they recruit based on the output of graduates in particular fields.

 

 
Web Statistics and Counters